21/04: Around 120 people died in shipwreck in the Central Med as authorities failed to intervene in time

22.04.2021 / 18:15 / Central Mediterranean Sea

Watch The Med Alarm Phone Investigations – 21st April 2021
Case name: 2021_04_21-CM406
Situation: Alarm Phone alerted Italian, Maltese and Libyan authorities to boat in distress for many hours. The boat shipwrecked as a result of the lack of assistance.
Status of WTM Investigation: Concluded
Place of Incident: Central Mediterranean

Summary of the case: On the morning of 21 April 2021, Alarm Phone was alerted by a local fisherman to a boat in distress off the coast of Libya. We received a satellite phone number and the information that there were approximately 120 people on board the boat which had left from Al-Khoms/Libya at approximately 22:00 on 20 April 2021. They had left together with a second boat – which would later be intercepted by the Libyan authorities.
We tried to reach the people on board but were not able to get through. Given the bad weather conditions in the area, we alerted relevant authorities by email at 09:51h CEST despite not having reached the people in distress directly. This means that from that time on, the following actors were aware of this boat in distress: MRCC Italy, RCC Malta, the so-called Libyan Coastguard, UNHCR, as well as NGO rescuers.
Shortly after, at 10:03h, we reached the boat in distress for the first time but due to a bad connection it was not possible to exchange information. At 10:22h, we re-established contact but could merely hear “call the rescue”. At 11:00h, we were able to reconnect. They forwarded us their GPS position and stated that there were about 130 people on board, including 7 women, one of whom was pregnant. They were on a rubber boat and said that the sea was rough. We immediately informed the relevant authorities and made the case public.
Over the following hours, we repeatedly reached the people in distress and relayed their GPS positions and their testimonies about the situation on board to the authorities. The situation on board deteriorated drastically, and the people in distress were in great panic, telling us that the waves were high and that water was entering the boat. We passed on all relevant information to the authorities by email, and also contacted them via phone. At around noon, we informed MRCC Italy about the merchant vessel BRUNA which was close to the case of distress and could have intervened. However, BRUNA proceeded its course.
At 14:11h, MRCC Italy told us in one phone conversations that we should inform the “competent authorities” about the distress case. These supposedly ‘competent’ authorities, the Libyan authorities, had not been reachable for several hours. Only at 14:44h could we get through to a Libyan officer who stated that they were aware of three boats and searching for them with their UBARI patrol vessel.
Over the next hours, we remained in close contact with the people in distress and relayed their updated GPS positions to the authorities at 16:15h, 17:16h and 19:15h. We also informed the authorities about the panic on board and the fact that merchant vessels were in the area of distress. At 17:53h, we received an email from MV OCEAN VIKING, directed to the authorities and us, stating that they would change course in search of the boat in distress.
At 19:15h, we informed the authorities that the people in distress could see a plane – which we believe was the Frontex aircraft OSPREY conducting an aerial operation in the area of distress.
At 20:15h, we reached the people in distress for the last time but the call cut before we could exchange information. They had repeatedly said in earlier conversations that their satellite phone was running out of battery.
At 20:52h, we spoke again with MRCC Italy and explained that we were hardly ever able to reach the Libyan authorities. The Italian officer told us: “We are doing our job, call if you have new information”.
At 22:22h, we finally reached the Libyan authorities again. The Libyan officer told us that they would not search for the boat in distress as the weather conditions were too bad. We found out that the so-called Libyan Coastguard had intercepted another boat, which had also alerted Alarm Phone, carrying about 100 people – in this case, a woman and her baby died. At 22:55h we informed MRCC Italy that the so-called Libyan Coastguard would not conduct a search operation.
The next day, 22 April 2021, at 7:30h, we spoke with MRCC Rome again, requesting immediate action. The Italian officer said: “Call us if you have new information, we know about the boat.” At 7:53h, we informed all authorities once more via email, including Frontex, requesting an aerial operation and guidance for the vessels in the vicinity of the boat in distress: the merchant vessels VS LISBETH, ALK, and MY ROSE, as well as the NGO vessel OCEAN VIKING.
At 8.30h, we also wrote an email to Frontex directly, asking for information about their aerial operation the day prior in the area of distress. At 8.49h, we received the following answer from Frontex:
“Dear Sir/Madam, Thank you for your email. Please be informed that Frontex has immediately relayed the message to the Italian and Maltese authorities.”
At 10:42h, we received the Libyan authorities again who denied having any knowledge on the boat in distress. At 11:31h, the Libyan authorities repeated that they had no information on the boat to which Alarm Phone had alerted them several times by email and phone. They also stated that Italy had requested them to give permission for merchant vessels to conduct a rescue operation, which they had given to them. They repeated that they had not gone out, and would not go out, due to the bad weather conditions.
At 17:08h, Alarm Phone received an email from OCEAN VIKING, directed to the authorities and us, stating that they had searched for the boat in distress together with MY ROSE, ALK and VS LISBETH and that they had found the remains of a shipwreck and several bodies, with no sign of survivors. Frontex’ Osprey was at the scene. VS LISBETH left the scene, stating that the Libyan patrol vessel UBARI would function as coordinator. However, UBARI was not on scene, and the merchant vessel and OCEAN VIKING were standing by. In the evening, SOS Méditerranée provided a statement: https://sosmediterranee.com/statement-ocean-viking-witnesses-aftermath-of-deadly-shipwreck-off-libya/
Credibility: UP DOWN 0
Layers »
  • Border police patrols
     
    While the exact location of patrols is of course constantly changing, this line indicates the approximate boundary routinely patrolled by border guards’ naval assets. In the open sea, it usually correspond to the outer extent of the contiguous zone, the area in which “State may exercise the control necessary to prevent infringement of its customs, fiscal, immigration or sanitary laws” (UNCLOS, art. 33). Data source: interviews with border police officials.
  • Coastal radars
     
    Approximate radar beam range covered by coastal radars operating in the frame of national marine traffic monitoring systems. The actual beam depends from several different parameters (including the type of object to be detected). Data source: Finmeccanica.
  • Exclusive Economic Zone
     
    Maritime area beyond and adjacent to the territorial sea in which the coastal state exercises sovereign rights for the purposes of exploring and exploiting, conserving and managing the natural resources, whether living or non-living, the seabed and its subsoil and the superjacent waters. Its breadth is 200 nautical miles from the straight baselines from which the territorial sea is measured (UNCLOS, Arts. 55, 56 and 57). Data source: Juan Luis Suárez de Vivero, Atlas of the European Seas and Oceans
  • Frontex operations
     
    Frontex has, in the past few years, carried out several sea operations at the maritime borders of the EU. The blue shapes indicate the approximate extend of these operations. Data source: Migreurop Altas.
  • Mobile phone coverage
     
    Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) network coverage. Data source: Collins Mobile Coverage.
  • Oil and gas platforms
     
    Oil and gas platforms in the Mediterranean. Data source:
  • Search and Rescue Zone
     
    An area of defined dimensions within which a given state is has the responsibility to co-ordinate Search and Rescue operations, i.e. the search for, and provision of aid to, persons, ships or other craft which are, or are feared to be, in distress or imminent danger. Data source: IMO availability of search and rescue (SAR) services - SAR.8/Circ.3, 17 June 2011.
  • Territorial Waters
     
    A belt of sea (usually extending up to 12 nautical miles) upon which the sovereignty of a coastal State extends (UNCLOS, Art. 2). Data source: Juan Luis Suárez de Vivero, Atlas of the European Seas and Oceans

Related Reports

14:45 Jun 03, 2015 / Central Mediterranean Sea, Off the coast of Libya Kms
About 110 people in distress in the Central Med, all rescued
06:28 Feb 06, 2021 / Central Mediterranean Kms
05/02 Two boats rescued by Ocean Viking
22:44 Aug 26, 2021 / Central Mediterranean Sea Kms
25/08: 40 travellers from Al Khoms intercepted by so-called Libyan coastguard.