13/07: 57 travelers left adrift for approx. 40 hours close to Lampedusa, rescued to Lampedusa

14.07.2020 / 21:22 / Central Mediterranean Sea

Watch The Med Alarm Phone Investigations – 13th of July 2020

Case name: 2020-07-13-CM264
Situation: 57 travelers started from Libya, adrift for 40 hours south of Lampedusa. Italian and Maltese authorities massively delay the rescue and refuse to provide information.
Status of WTM Investigation: Concluded
Place of Incident: Central Mediterranean Sea

Summary of the Case:
On 13th July 2020 at 01:24h CEST, the Alarm Phone received a call from a group of 57 travelers. They had started from Zawiya, Libya, in the evening of the 11th July, in a wooden boat. They had run out of fuel and were drifting, and water was entering the boat. Our shift team tried to explain them how to read their GPS coordinates on the satellite phone, but the people could not find this option on the phone. We explained to them that for a rescue it was crucial to pass the GPS location to the coastguard. They said they could see lights which they thought were the coast of Lampedusa. For the next half an hour, we repeatedly talked to them, trying to find out their GPS coordinates, but without success. Nevertheless, at 02:00h, we informed the Italian coastguard via phone call and e-mail about the distress case. At 02:58h, we got through to the boat again, informing them we had alerted the Italian authorities. We could not understand them, due to a bad connection. At 04:00h, we talked to the travelers again and they said there had been a boat flashing them with lights. We thought it could be the coastguard and instructed them how to act during the rescue. At 04:28h, we talked to them again and they transmitted GPS coordinates to us, but the coordinates seemed incomplete or in a wrong format. They said they would try to send them via SMS, but we did not receive any. For the next hours, we could not reach them anymore.
At 08:11h, our media team sent out a first tweet about the case. Meanwhile, a relative had gotten in touch with the Alarm Phone, who was also in contact with the travelers. We told him that we needed their GPS coordinates, and he agreed to try and find out. At 09:15h, we reached the travelers. Again, we tried to go through the menu of their satellite phone with them but did not manage to find out their location. We agreed to send them a text message with the instructions and call back then. At 09:50h, we called back, and they said that they could still not find the correct function on their phone. At 11:13h, the relative contacted us and transmitted us a GPS location he had gotten from the travelers. We noticed that he coordinates had an unclear format again but seemed to be close to the Italian Search and Rescue zone. We sent this information via e-mail to the Italian coastguard at 11:40h, including Sea Watch’s search aircraft Moonbird and the Italian UNHCR in the mail-correspondence. We asked the relative to try and clarify the format of the coordinates with the travelers. At 12:54h, he reported that the people had seen an aircraft and that another fishing vessel had stopped by. At 12:59h, our shift team received an e-mail from the Moonbird, also addressing the Maltese and Italian coastguards, reporting that they had spotted a blue wooden boat adrift, carrying 50-60 persons, close to a fishing vessel. It was close to Lampedusa, but in the Maltese Search and Rescue zone. We still could not reach the travelers. At 13:45h, our media team sent out another tweet, making public that the Moonbird had spotted the people in the Maltese SAR zone. At 14:10h, we sent an e-mail to the Armed Forces of Malta (AFM), asking them to coordinate the rescue of the people as they were in their SAR zone. At 14:25h, we called the AFM. They stated to investigate on the case but did not give us details. Neither we nor the relative could get through to the travelers. At 14:40h, we talked to the Italian coastguard, but they only referred us to Malta. At 15:19h, the relative asked if we had news and we told him that authorities were informed. He could still not reach the travelers. At 16:38h, he called us again, very desperate, telling us that he believed the people must be dead by then. At 17:20h, we called the Italian coastguard. They said they were working on the case and asked if AFM were informed. We confirmed this but did not get more information about any rescue measures of the Italian coastguard. At 17:35h, we called AFM. They stated: “We have no information” and hung up. At 18:04h, we received an e-mail from Moonbird, also addressing Maltese and Italian authorities, reporting they had spotted the boat in distress at the same location as five hours before, and that the cargo vessel Karewood Star was standing by. At 18:17h, our media team made this public on Twitter, raising attention on the authorities refusing to provide information. Our shift team could still not re-establish contact to the travelers.
At 22:00h, we called the Italian coastguard, and received the information that they were not coordinating the rescue, because the travelers’ boat was not in the Italian SAR zone. They refused to confirm that AFM were coordinating the rescue. At 22:52h, the Alarm Phone retweeted Moonbirds tweet, in which they described that they had spotted the boat south of Lampedusa, next to a cargo ship and a rescue vessel of the Italian coastguard, and that hours later, the coastguard had left and the boat in distress was still drifting at the same place.
During the night, neither us nor the relative could reach the travelers. At 08:00h, with an online tracking tool, we could see that the Karewood Star had moved away from the last known location of the travelers. At 09:19h, we reached its shipping company and were told that the crew of the Karewood Star had not picked the travelers up, because the Italian coastguard had been standing by. At 09:30h, we called the Italian coastguard and were told that their ship had not picked the travelers up, because they were in the Maltese SAR zone. At 09:45h, we called AFM who stated that they were not taking measures for a rescue of the people, that the boat was still drifting close to Lampedusa and that AFM were coordinating the case with the relevant competent authorities. At 10:52h, we sent an e-mail to Maltese and Italian authorities, the airborne operations of Sea Watch and the UNHCR, pointing out the situation of non-assistance and stressing the need for the people to be rescued after more than 48 hours at sea. At 10:52h, via a tweet, we made this situation of non-assistance from different sides public.
At 13:02h, we spoke to the Italian coastguard, and they repeated that they were still not taking over the rescue of the people, since they were not in Italian waters. At 13:36h, an officer of AFM told us, that he thought they were working on the case, but that it would take time, because they were dealing with several distress cases. Two hours later, at 15:38h, we received the same information from AFM, and they did still not clearly confirm to coordinate the rescue of our case. At 16:25h, our shift team spoke to the captain of the Karewood Star. He confirmed that the Italian coastguard had only observed the travelers’ boat without intervening, stating it was Malta’s responsibility to rescue. At 17:42h, via media reports, we received the information that the travelers had been rescued by Italian authorities and had been brought to Lampedusa.

Twitter chronology:

13.07.:
08:11h – https://twitter.com/alarm_phone/status/1282558364225019911
11:47h – https://twitter.com/alarm_phone/status/1282612683150438403
13:45h – https://twitter.com/alarm_phone/status/1282642239559172096
18:17h – https://twitter.com/alarm_phone/status/1282710877465083909
22:52h – https://twitter.com/alarm_phone/status/1282779893277884419

14.07.:
10:52h – https://twitter.com/alarm_phone/status/1282961095154642946
18:52h – https://twitter.com/alarm_phone/status/1283081861967880193
Last update: 20:16 Oct 06, 2020
Credibility: UP DOWN 0
Layers »
  • Border police patrols
     
    While the exact location of patrols is of course constantly changing, this line indicates the approximate boundary routinely patrolled by border guards’ naval assets. In the open sea, it usually correspond to the outer extent of the contiguous zone, the area in which “State may exercise the control necessary to prevent infringement of its customs, fiscal, immigration or sanitary laws” (UNCLOS, art. 33). Data source: interviews with border police officials.
  • Coastal radars
     
    Approximate radar beam range covered by coastal radars operating in the frame of national marine traffic monitoring systems. The actual beam depends from several different parameters (including the type of object to be detected). Data source: Finmeccanica.
  • Exclusive Economic Zone
     
    Maritime area beyond and adjacent to the territorial sea in which the coastal state exercises sovereign rights for the purposes of exploring and exploiting, conserving and managing the natural resources, whether living or non-living, the seabed and its subsoil and the superjacent waters. Its breadth is 200 nautical miles from the straight baselines from which the territorial sea is measured (UNCLOS, Arts. 55, 56 and 57). Data source: Juan Luis Suárez de Vivero, Atlas of the European Seas and Oceans
  • Frontex operations
     
    Frontex has, in the past few years, carried out several sea operations at the maritime borders of the EU. The blue shapes indicate the approximate extend of these operations. Data source: Migreurop Altas.
  • Mobile phone coverage
     
    Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) network coverage. Data source: Collins Mobile Coverage.
  • Oil and gas platforms
     
    Oil and gas platforms in the Mediterranean. Data source:
  • Search and Rescue Zone
     
    An area of defined dimensions within which a given state is has the responsibility to co-ordinate Search and Rescue operations, i.e. the search for, and provision of aid to, persons, ships or other craft which are, or are feared to be, in distress or imminent danger. Data source: IMO availability of search and rescue (SAR) services - SAR.8/Circ.3, 17 June 2011.
  • Territorial Waters
     
    A belt of sea (usually extending up to 12 nautical miles) upon which the sovereignty of a coastal State extends (UNCLOS, Art. 2). Data source: Juan Luis Suárez de Vivero, Atlas of the European Seas and Oceans

Related Reports

18:05 Jun 13, 2021 / Central Mediterranean Sea Kms
12/06: Around 100 travellers in urgent distress rescued to Lampedusa
15:00 Feb 13, 2022 / Central Mediterranean Sea Kms
12/02: Around 60 travellers arrived to Lampedusa
17:12 Dec 24, 2020 / Central Mediterranean Sea Kms
23/12: 65 travellers crossing the Central Med arrived to Lampedusa
20:56 Dec 23, 2021 / Central Mediterranean Sea Kms
22/12: Around 40 travellers probably arrived to Lampedusa
10:28 Jul 23, 2020 / Central Mediterranean Kms
22/07: 83 people left from Zuwara, reached Lampedusa independently