Alarm Phone alerted to 7 distress cases in the Aegean Sea near Samos, Chios and Lesvos, rescue of all confirmed/presumed

29.09.2015 / 13:01 / Aegean Sea near Samos, Chios and Lesvos

Watch The Med Alarm Phone Investigations – 28th of September 2015

Case name: 2015_09_28-AEG84
Situation: 7 distress cases in the Aegean Sea, near Samos, Chios and Lesvos
Status of WTM Investigation: Concluded
Place of Incident: Aegean Sea

Summary of the Cases: On Monday the 28th of September 2015, around midnight, the Alarm Phone received GPS coordinates of a vessel in distress near Samos Island/Greece through a contact person (case 1). We were told that this was a very urgent situation with some of the 44 people already overboard. We tried to call the group of travellers directly but could not get through to them. At 00.04am, we received new coordinates. Our shift team reached out to the Greek coastguards who noted down the coordinates and confirmed that they had already sent out a vessel to that position. He asked us to inform them if we had news about this case. We were then also alerted by two other contact persons about the same case. One of them also stated that people were overboard. At 1.15am, the Greek authorities informed us that they had just rescued 48 people, close to the coordinates they had received from us. We were still not able to contact the people directly but through our contact persons we finally received confirmation of their rescue at 1.26am.

At 5.16am, we were informed by a contact person about a distress case, again near Samos Island/Greece (case 2). Our contact persons had already reached out to the Greek coastguards but did not have the phone number of the travellers by then. We then got in touch with the Greek authorities at 5.24am and passed on the phone number. At 6.18am, our contact person forwarded a message from the group in distress: ‘no help has come please help our children’. At 6.40am, the Greek coastguards told us that, as far as they were aware, all vessels near Samos had been rescued. We tried to reach the phone of the people in distress again but could still not reach them. Our contact persons had also no news and for hours we did not know whether they had been rescued or not. However, at 2.17pm, we were able to see that they had come online on WhatsApp at 1.21pm, a good indication that they had presumably been rescued or had made it to the island independently.

At 5.31am, we were alerted via WhatsApp to another emergency situation concerning a group of 20 people, including women and children on a vessel near Chios/Greece (case 3). The contact person who informed us asked us to inform the Turkish coastguard to the case. We repeatedly tried to call the travellers directly, without success. At 6.29am we were informed via WhatsApp that the people had been rescued by the Turkish coastguards.

At 7.51am, the Syrian activist collective informed us about another distress situation, this time south of Lesvos/Greece concerning 40 persons, including 6 women and 10 children (case 4). We were able to get in touch with the travellers at 7.54am but communication was difficult as the person on the phone was clearly in panic and had difficulties to make himself understood, also people were screaming in the background. We asked him to directly call the international emergency number 112. We contacted the Greek coastguards and passed on the information about the vessel, including their coordinates. Shortly afterwards we received updated coordinates but when we wanted to pass them on to the Greek authorities they accused us of lying and pretending to possess information we did not have. At 8.27am we heard from the people on the boat that their engine had broken down and that they were now paddling. At 8.50am, we learned through our initial contact person that the travellers had been rescued by the Greek coastguards.

At 10.45am various individuals informed us about the same distress case near Lesvos Island/Greece, involving 55 people (case 5). We received their GPS position shortly afterwards and passed it on to the Greek coastguards at 11.18am. They stated that the vessel was still located in Turkish waters but that, nonetheless, a Greek rescue vessel was nearby. Afterwards, several different GPS positions were sent to us by contact persons and it was not fully clear where the vessel was at that moment in time. We then also informed the Turkish coastguards who confirmed that they would look into the situation. One of our contact persons informed us at 12.05pm that a Greek rescue vessel was approaching the people in distress and their rescue was confirmed at 12.21pm. In turn, we informed all the individuals who had contacted us about their rescue.

At 1.19pm, our shift team was alerted via Facebook about a vessel carrying 35 people in distress (case 6). While no coordinates were given, we received a phone number of one of the people on board. While we once got through to them, communication was difficult. It seemed, however, as if they were not on a boat anymore. At 1.53pm we reached a friend of some of the travellers in Turkey who confirmed that the vessel had been rescued by the Greek coastguards.

At 11.05pm, we learned about 3 people in distress near Chios Island/Greece (case 7). They were already close to the island and they confirmed that when we spoke to them directly. They sent us coordinates but already minutes later they stated that they had reached the island independently and were safe.
Credibility: UP DOWN 0
Layers »
  • Border police patrols
     
    While the exact location of patrols is of course constantly changing, this line indicates the approximate boundary routinely patrolled by border guards’ naval assets. In the open sea, it usually correspond to the outer extent of the contiguous zone, the area in which “State may exercise the control necessary to prevent infringement of its customs, fiscal, immigration or sanitary laws” (UNCLOS, art. 33). Data source: interviews with border police officials.
  • Coastal radars
     
    Approximate radar beam range covered by coastal radars operating in the frame of national marine traffic monitoring systems. The actual beam depends from several different parameters (including the type of object to be detected). Data source: Finmeccanica.
  • Exclusive Economic Zone
     
    Maritime area beyond and adjacent to the territorial sea in which the coastal state exercises sovereign rights for the purposes of exploring and exploiting, conserving and managing the natural resources, whether living or non-living, the seabed and its subsoil and the superjacent waters. Its breadth is 200 nautical miles from the straight baselines from which the territorial sea is measured (UNCLOS, Arts. 55, 56 and 57). Data source: Juan Luis Suárez de Vivero, Atlas of the European Seas and Oceans
  • Frontex operations
     
    Frontex has, in the past few years, carried out several sea operations at the maritime borders of the EU. The blue shapes indicate the approximate extend of these operations. Data source: Migreurop Altas.
  • Mobile phone coverage
     
    Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) network coverage. Data source: Collins Mobile Coverage.
  • Oil and gas platforms
     
    Oil and gas platforms in the Mediterranean. Data source:
  • Search and Rescue Zone
     
    An area of defined dimensions within which a given state is has the responsibility to co-ordinate Search and Rescue operations, i.e. the search for, and provision of aid to, persons, ships or other craft which are, or are feared to be, in distress or imminent danger. Data source: IMO availability of search and rescue (SAR) services - SAR.8/Circ.3, 17 June 2011.
  • Territorial Waters
     
    A belt of sea (usually extending up to 12 nautical miles) upon which the sovereignty of a coastal State extends (UNCLOS, Art. 2). Data source: Juan Luis Suárez de Vivero, Atlas of the European Seas and Oceans